<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Characteristics &amp; Principles of User Experience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mauvyrusset.com/2009/07/22/the-characteristics-principles-of-user-experience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mauvyrusset.com/2009/07/22/the-characteristics-principles-of-user-experience/</link>
	<description>User Experience, the Universe and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:41:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Experiencia de Usuario y Usabilidad. Marcando la diferencia entre conceptos. &#124; Weblog de Sergio Ortega</title>
		<link>http://mauvyrusset.com/2009/07/22/the-characteristics-principles-of-user-experience/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Experiencia de Usuario y Usabilidad. Marcando la diferencia entre conceptos. &#124; Weblog de Sergio Ortega]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mauvyrusset.com/?p=99#comment-355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] de Jesse James Garrett en el IA Summit de 2009, elaboró varios documentos que recogían las características y los principios de la Experiencia de Usuario. La idea era profundizar en los criterios que definían una buena experiencia y superar el grado de [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] de Jesse James Garrett en el IA Summit de 2009, elaboró varios documentos que recogían las características y los principios de la Experiencia de Usuario. La idea era profundizar en los criterios que definían una buena experiencia y superar el grado de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indi Young</title>
		<link>http://mauvyrusset.com/2009/07/22/the-characteristics-principles-of-user-experience/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Indi Young]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mauvyrusset.com/?p=99#comment-266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good start!  :)  Is it possible to present non-web examples, as well?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good start!  <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Is it possible to present non-web examples, as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jody</title>
		<link>http://mauvyrusset.com/2009/07/22/the-characteristics-principles-of-user-experience/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mauvyrusset.com/?p=99#comment-265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very cool. I would argue that Google Search might be &#039;passively&#039; social/interactive, as they track and collect clicks which in-turn may influence page rankings for others.  

Also, if you have a Google account you can promote, comment, and delete some search results.  You can also see what others think of certain pages/sites. More:  http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/11/searchwiki-make-search-your-own.html 

But I understand your challenge in finding a example site that *isn&#039;t sociable. ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool. I would argue that Google Search might be &#8216;passively&#8217; social/interactive, as they track and collect clicks which in-turn may influence page rankings for others.  </p>
<p>Also, if you have a Google account you can promote, comment, and delete some search results.  You can also see what others think of certain pages/sites. More:  <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/11/searchwiki-make-search-your-own.html" rel="nofollow">http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/11/searchwiki-make-search-your-own.html</a> </p>
<p>But I understand your challenge in finding a example site that *isn&#8217;t sociable. <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://mauvyrusset.com/2009/07/22/the-characteristics-principles-of-user-experience/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 02:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mauvyrusset.com/?p=99#comment-264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Dave, I 100% agree with you - and I meant (but forgot) to say it in the post and diagram - the characteristics I listed are just a start, i&#039;m sure there are many more that could be added.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dave, I 100% agree with you &#8211; and I meant (but forgot) to say it in the post and diagram &#8211; the characteristics I listed are just a start, i&#8217;m sure there are many more that could be added.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Malouf</title>
		<link>http://mauvyrusset.com/2009/07/22/the-characteristics-principles-of-user-experience/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Malouf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 02:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mauvyrusset.com/?p=99#comment-263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As someone who harshed on Mr. Dalton last time, I gotta say that this really came together.

My only comment would be that your qualities stack (base chemicals) dichotomies is a framework, but not a complete list. I think there are many more that could be added. I LOVE the addition of impartiality. It really through me (like WTF!?!) but then as a dichotomy for UX I loved it!

To me that 1st stack is the key for critique. I think the 2nd pyramid is nice, but less interesting to me from the part of view of critique. It also feels more static and less extensible.

But in all, I think this is GREAT!!!! Kudos!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who harshed on Mr. Dalton last time, I gotta say that this really came together.</p>
<p>My only comment would be that your qualities stack (base chemicals) dichotomies is a framework, but not a complete list. I think there are many more that could be added. I LOVE the addition of impartiality. It really through me (like WTF!?!) but then as a dichotomy for UX I loved it!</p>
<p>To me that 1st stack is the key for critique. I think the 2nd pyramid is nice, but less interesting to me from the part of view of critique. It also feels more static and less extensible.</p>
<p>But in all, I think this is GREAT!!!! Kudos!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

